Nationally,
road systems have been trending away from state control of roads. This is unfortunate,
however, considering that roads maintained by local agencies are very inconsistent
and unreliable in quality, maintenance and standardization. This might be okay if all county roads were truly local, but they are not. Around twenty percent of local roads are actually highways. Unfortunately, in many states including Georgia this is the case. However, if steps are taken to assure that at least
the local roads of greatest importance are maintained and treated on the same level
as their state-owned and maintained counterparts, then it might be possible to have that up to twenty percent of local roads to that level without having the state take responsibility for them all.
The
concept that is described here is a plan to scale back state highways in the state, but replace
them with a system of major county highways, described hereafter as the "County
Primary Highway System". The "County Primary Highway System" does not just mean major county roads. It is a concept where maintenance responsibility is shared with some of the maintenance undergone by the state and
some traffic engineering for maintenance overseen by the statel, but the ownership and overall responsibility remains local. Combined with
much more stringent standards than the current system, the plan here is a highly
unusual one that explains how better roads can be achieved with a major turnback
at the least cost, the only way such a plan would be effective in lieu of what is currently
in place.
The
idea here of a major decommissioning of state routes is not to be taken only at
face value. In other words, turning back a tremendous number of roads very well
can and often is disastrous because most counties in Georgia simply do not have the resources to maintain major roadways to the level necessary to ensure proper maintenance. A major decommissioning not only routinely lowers
the overall quality of maintenance on roads that generally still serve state highway
traffic volumes, but also make statewide travel more difficult, hurts the local economy
on affected roads and leads to excessive traffic on other state highways
due to the unfamiliarity of non-local drivers with the local system.
The proposal here is essentially a very moderate proposal that basically involves the combination of a conservative, local-government
approach combined with a more progressive move to centralize elements that are difficult for local governments to address adequately. In other words, it serves as a balance in all categories. This proposal also includes and matches up elements
of other proposals presented here in this section of Peach State Roads including the Signed County Highway System, Engineering Aid/Standardization and Intergovernmental Agreements proposals.
Below are different topics explaining the different elements of the County Primary Highway System:
- The problem with the current State Highway System
- Why change the system?
- How a large scale transfer of state routes to local control can be beneficial and what must be done for it to be successful.
- How the County Primary Highway System can be cost-efficient
- Specific rules for the division of responsibilities between the state and local governments
- Signing the county routes: a major element the new system
- The incentives to counties and cities
- The strong emphasis on sharing of services
- Final word and commentary
- Summary
- Provisions
|